Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI Radeon X1550

AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI Radeon X1550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV516
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
27W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy