Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +530%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy