Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +712%
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Oct 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
90W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
G94
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
G94-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy