Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +427%
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Apr 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
G92B
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy