Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +371%
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 620
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
May 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
49W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GF108
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
GF108-100-KB-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy