Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +136%
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
768
Shading Units
216
48
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT200
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy