Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1203MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 OEM +94%
2.464 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1203 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.50 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.99 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.464 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.99 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GM206S
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
950 OEM
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy