Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +654%
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV630
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy