Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI Radeon HD 3690

AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI Radeon HD 3690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 3690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 26.56GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +195%
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3690
0.429 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
830 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
26.56GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
4
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.72 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
428.8 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV670
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy