Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD FireStream 9270

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +5%
1.267 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV770
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy