Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +352%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy