Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +76%
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
8
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy