Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +15%
1.267 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU117
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy