Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

AMD FirePro W4100 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100 +351%
0.645 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
120
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.752 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
142.6 GFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV630
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy