Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 32.26GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100 +593%
0.645 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.26GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
G84
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
G84-400-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy