Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100 +313%
0.645 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
512
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
29W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GF119
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy