Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630 +183%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
TU117
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy