Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES

AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1280GB)
176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES +62%
1.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
512
Shading Units
336
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.91 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1046 GFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.19 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GF114
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy