Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Boost Clock1058MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 +403%
3.25 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
195W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GK104
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy