Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1076MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 980 Ti +839%
6.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1076 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
103.3 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
189.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.060 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
189.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GM200
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
GM200-310-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy