Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100 +29%
0.645 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Oland
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy