Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

AMD FirePro W4100
VS
AMD Radeon RX 5300
AMD FirePro W4100
AMD Radeon RX 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 +618%
4.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2020
FirePro
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1408
32
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Navi 14
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy