Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4130M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W4130M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4130M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4130M 's Advantages
Boost Clock825MHz
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4130M
0.633 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +372%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

775 MHz
Base Clock
-
825 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
-
-
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Mars
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy