Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4170M vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

AMD FirePro W4170M vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1200MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4170M
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 PCIe +211%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2015
Release Date
Sep 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy