Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4170M vs AMD Radeon R9 M275

AMD FirePro W4170M vs AMD Radeon R9 M275

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4170M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
AMD Radeon R9 M275 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (925MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4170M
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M275 +71%
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2015
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
10
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Venus
-
GPU Variant
Venus XTX (216-0846033)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy