AMD FirePro W4170M vs NVIDIA T600 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M and 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1395MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4170M
0.691 TFLOPS
T600 Max Q
+261%
2.5 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
40W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7
