Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD FirePro M5725

AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD FirePro M5725

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 512MB VRAM FirePro M5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M +59%
0.691 TFLOPS
FirePro M5725
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
900 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
M96
-
GPU Variant
M96 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy