Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M +259%
0.691 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Mar 2009
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
900 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
64
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy