Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1200MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM +211%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Sep 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
14
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy