Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (900MHz vs 863MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 765M +91%
1.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
May 2013
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
863 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.81 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.23 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1326 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.23 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N14E-GE-B-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy