Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W

AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 25W to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (930MHz vs 900MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 25W +141%
1.667 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Aug 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
720 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.76 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.333 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.667 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.08 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18S-G5
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy