Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe

AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9390 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1089MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon E9390 PCIe +464%
3.903 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Oct 2019
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
713 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1089 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.85 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
122.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.903 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.903 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy