Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon R9 M365X

AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon R9 M365X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M365X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
AMD Radeon R9 M365X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (925MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M365X +71%
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Tropo
-
GPU Variant
Tropo XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy