Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI FirePro V3750

AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +305%
1.428 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
4
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
RV730
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
48W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy