Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FireStream 9270

AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +19%
1.428 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
RV770
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy