Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 215W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +200%
1.428 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
215W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
R600
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy