Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs Intel Arc Pro A60

AMD FirePro W4300 vs Intel Arc Pro A60

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 130W)
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60 +488%
8.397 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jun 2023
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
DG2-256
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy