Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +199%
1.428 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
GT200
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy