Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon RX 460

AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon RX 460

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon RX 460 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 460 +50%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Aug 2016
FirePro
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Baffin
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
3 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy