Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600

AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 132W)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2491MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6600 +525%
8.928 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Oct 2021
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1626 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2491 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.4 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.86 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.928 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
558.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
132W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Navi 23
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 23 XL (215-130000016)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy