Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 50W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
44W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
RV535
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
GCN 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy