Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5000 DVI vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

AMD FirePro W5000 DVI vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 DVI and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5000 DVI 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV535
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
44W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy