Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5000 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

AMD FirePro W5000 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5000
1.267 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +500%
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
185W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU106
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy