Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5000
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +223%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy