Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

AMD FirePro W5000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5000
1.267 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +847%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
AD107
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy