Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5170M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W5170M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5170M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5170M 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5170M
1.184 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +214%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
32
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
37.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
1184 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
74.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tropo
GPU Name
Amethyst
Tropo XT
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy