Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +125%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Amethyst
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
5 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy