Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1150MHz
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 965M +42%
2.355 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jan 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
935 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.80 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.355 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
GM206S
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
N16E-GR-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy