Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 256MB VRAM GeForce Go 6800 Ultra to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2005
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce Go 6
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
12
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
NV41
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
GO6800 U
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
89W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy