Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600

AMD FirePro W6170M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M +1542%
1.971 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
0.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro Mobile
Generation
M7x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
120
56
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
120.0 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
M76
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
M76-M (216MJBKA13FG)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy